ART EVIDENCE

Every judgment has a reason. Every report has a date.

ART EVIDENCEArtwork Documentation Review

Dossier review report

Example — invented work · as of 2026-10-31 · view: example with an invented work, people and documents

Artist
Marco Vellani (declared)
Title
Composizione blu (declared)
Technique
olio su tela (declared)
Dimensions
100 x 80 cm (declared)
Date
1962 (declared)

Documentary completeness and consistency: GREEN

A1Image of the frontcompleteimage of the front provided
A2Basic datacompletebasic data complete
A3Authoritative sourcecompletesource with a specific reference, correspondence with the work confirmed
A4Identifying viewsmissingview of the back missing
A5Signature and inscriptionscompletesignature described in the source
A6Provenancemissingprovenance not stated
A7Exhibitions and literaturenot applicableno exhibitions or literature declared
A8Known versionsmissingsearch for known versions not recorded

Documentary completeness to continue reviewing the offer: YELLOW additions needed

B1Ownercompleteowner stated in confidential form
B2Acquisition titlemissingacquisition title not stated
B3Authorisationspartialchain of intermediaries not documented up to the owner
B4Economic termspartialeconomic terms partial
B5Location and circulationmissinglocation and circulation not stated
B6Restrictions and disputesmissingrestrictions and disputes not declared
B7Stolen art registerscompleteno hit in the service consulted
B8Conditionmissingcondition not stated

Notes

Neither judgment establishes whether the work can be sold, nor the legal validity of ownership, titles or mandates.

ART EVIDENCE reviews the documentation of a dossier: it does not authenticate, attribute or value works of art, and does not buy, sell or broker them.

Method: automatic CRA on the data and decisions recorded in the dossier · CRA 2.0.1 · evidence considered: 12 · input fingerprint 8c3eb2bb981397bf…

Back to the home page